WISR Ord Shs V.WZR

RE: Target

[canadafox]

nodrog;  There appears to be a misconception concerning the word 'correct'.  Correct is only known after the fact.  Pretty much all wells in Kurdistan will be drilled at a PROGNOSED crestal position as this the gives best chances of intersecting over a given well depth the highest number of potentially hydro-carbon bearing layers at their shallowest depths and at the position of greatest formation stress ( for fractures ).  Qara Dagh had poor seismic data because the anticline structure is heavily eroded and the bulky VibroSeis ( TM ) units ( hi-quality data ) could only cover a fraction of the PSC area.  When you see the pictures then you will know why.  QD is a very high exposed anticline ( hence the weathering ) and the formations have extreme dips as you outline.  The surface forms ( sidewalls ) are quite spectacular.  WZR's blocks are buried anticlines where there has been no weathering of the equivalent producing formations and the anticline deformation is much less.  This means that seismic data was much simpler and of much higher quality than on QD and other more Northerly Kurdistani structures.  This is even before the planned 3D on Garmian for example.  The K-2 well is only 2 Kms approx. from K-1 and WZR will have a very precise estimate of where these downdip formation intersections lie.  They will not 'miss' the planned target zones.