OTCPK:WSRLF - Post by User
Comment by
canadafoxon Nov 09, 2013 2:56pm
335 Views
Post# 21891685
RE:RE:RE:Attention all....
RE:RE:RE:Attention all....tw: Am I an insider? No. Why do you ask? There are many here that know that directly and know I live 1000s of miles from either Calgary or Kurdistan.
I am however an E&P industry insider and do not need to putter around with guesses on most issues.
Some points:
a) It is standard not to answer highly detailed technical questions when the audience is non-technical and time is limited. Simon Hatfield explained that and did the professional thing which was to invite API42 to contact them. This has been done and arrangements made.
b) Simon was not 'aghast' but being completely open in response to a question on an esoteric subject matter. He is a geophysicist I understand and cement bonding / channelling and well remediation is not his area - nor mine - nor very many others. He seeks to answer every one of my technical questions when they are posed face-to-face. There is not another CEO of a junior E&P that has his technical ability and willingness to engage his retail investors. He is the very opposite of the person you seek to describe.
c) How can you possibly conclude that the company want 'less informed' questioners? They responded in exactly the way that investors would have wanted surely. That is; 'You have highly specialised knowledge? Then come on over and we''ll listen' Do you think Talisman would have done that? And, they are the ones responsible for the K-3 well.
d) Why would API42 have to be careful? Is he in danger or something? He is an industry technical specialist and may be able to make himself, WZR and ourselves money in future. An NDA must be signed in these situations or the company would leave themselves open to information escape and subsquent legal problems. It is standard industry practice. What was the point of that remark?
e) WZR told you specifically why the reasons for the K-3 well not being productive. Talisman ( the operator ) said nothing in contrast. Again, why do you comment in this manner when WZR gave us chapter and verse on the matter?