TSXV:YDX.H - Post by User
Comment by
e36drifteron Mar 18, 2021 1:18pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
100 Views
Post# 32826925
RE:RE:RE:To remain halted -
RE:RE:RE:To remain halted - Yup...sorry about that. Can we blame it on a lack of coffee?
The first reply was intended to quote you. The second was TonkaDog.
I'm trying to get an understanding if the company intentionally didn't disclose informatino to initiate a halt, or something else.
Looking into it more closely, I get what you're saying. Maybe I'm just hopeful..
From a more disciplined perspective, I do agree with the lack of details and disclosures. I guess I'm just as uncertain as you are.
2020oilgamble wrote: Given you don't use the quote feature....i don't know whom you're response is in regard to...
Me, or the rather negative, but reasonably accurate summary of this being messed up.
You will note IIROC halted the stock , not the company this time.
That means the company didn't have its ducks in a row. And that means IIROC didnt like the disclosure or the premature news release from the day before.
The last RTO I went through HNL/DXT just last year didn't require a halt AT ALL.
Ducks were not in a row.
Ducks have now been shot.
e36drifter wrote:
I don't know how this is a constructive post. For example, I don't think that IIROC 'likes' something or not. It's simply a matter of how news may affect stock.
In this case, we're talking about a significant RTO. The stock will likely be halted until June/July, if not longer (ie: close of the transaction).