RE:RE:RE:Hope for 2024rudinm wrote: Well said, and i say it looks bad but the goal for verde is clear sale the product to make use of the new plant!!!
We will find out if the product is liked and appreciated by the farmer's
According to years of YT testimonials the product is liked by farmers and for those who use it for many harvests, they report increasing improvements in soil biodiversity and product yield. Hopefully Verde has an incentivization program that rewards long time customers who recruit new customer neighbors. This seems like a no brainer strategy: if your next door neighbor is using KCl and filling 80 bags a hectare and the farmer using kforte is filling 100, that recruitment should be quite easy.
On the carbon side, if you listen to some of the more advanced companies (relative to Verde) in the carbon sequestration space like Loam, Lithos or Eion, their leaders realize the only way to scale up quickly is to incentivize farmers into becoming carbon experts of their land, which is the primary reason ERW credits are currently so high. Companies are passing on a fair portion of these credits via free product and delivery and even per hectare kick backs to make farmer buy-in almost a certainty. If Verde builds a robust MRV validation/accreditation reputation and earns high CORC sales value in the $300 range, it is actually possible that they could completely alter their model toward a drastically reduced pricing scheme.ensuring expedited product adoption. Brazil is probably a few years behind N America's pace but it seems clear that incrementally increasing carbon tax plans and regulatory change will force structural change amongst the entire agricultural industry.