Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Bridge Resources Corp V.BUK

Add To Watchlist

Bullboard (TSXV:BUK)

View:

Comment by Babu2on Aug 22, 2011 3:28pm

RE: Increased my holdings in BUK

I am in. Good luck all.

308

Discussion

Comment by Clemmie70on Aug 22, 2011 2:47pm

RE: I have Elephant Balls!

swanball has elephant balls?? I'm so confused......lolTo me, I would assume that Bridge would have had a good idea of their refinance options prior to their town meeting. Otherwise, why put ...more

209

Discussion

Post by swanballon Aug 22, 2011 2:34pm

I have Elephant Balls!

EOM

239

Comment by Toasted2on Aug 22, 2011 12:22pm

RE: RE: RE: Increased my holdings in BUK

Elephant Balls? lolActually, I don't think its balls...I think anyone with too much BUK has "Rocks their Head"....I put in $6k last week...If its gone its gone...but with the assets ...more

235

Discussion

Comment by cottager97on Aug 22, 2011 11:31am

RE: RE: Increased my holdings in BUK

Well said toasted !Russian roulette might be a safer game...I pulled the trigger on this one last week,but its currently 3% of my portfolio and hoping if and when it pops I can head for the exit ...more

222

Discussion

Comment by Toasted2on Aug 22, 2011 11:01am

RE: Increased my holdings in BUK

Well Banjo...Perhaps you should take a few night basic finance courses....You're either smoking the good stuff or haven't got a clue what you're doing...You said..."this was one of ...more

219

Discussion

Post by banjo2on Aug 22, 2011 9:50am

Increased my holdings in BUK

The reason I more than doubled my position this morning in BUK is that it is the one company I could find that has the lowest downside and a considerable potential upside. With such volatile ...more

313

Comment by bobsmith1on Aug 22, 2011 8:21am

RE: Favourable/Unfavourable

Two words ! "economic development" to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. Rezoning, noise abatement, landscaping, pollution emission controls, public nudity control.......will all ...more

233

Discussion

Post by Bob_Branton Aug 22, 2011 6:58am

Favourable/Unfavourable

This is the way the Payette county decision was recorded.Not sure how a conditional use would be impacted by the lack of proper zoning. I would assume they would need the zoning changed from ...more

360

Comment by cfhasibon Aug 21, 2011 10:20am

RE: More details! Looking very good!!!

Key words to notice are:1) Average Noise - that means not at any given point2) excludes maintenance and truck noise3) Edge of the property - depending on the size of the land and point zero of the ...more

394

Discussion

Post by swanballon Aug 21, 2011 9:59am

More details! Looking very good!!!

Thanks for thequestion yogi. The noise restriction attached to the conditional usepermit requires an average noise level of 45 decibels at the edge of theproperty. This would not include maintenance ...more

462

Comment by swanballon Aug 21, 2011 9:44am

RE: what we allready know, but here you go

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Construction of a gas compression &dehydration station for natural gas collection) by Bridge EnergyInc. for property located on SW 2nd Ave. approximately .3miles west of ...more

351

Discussion

Post by bobsmith1on Aug 20, 2011 3:23pm

Noise Abatement

I think someone already posted this link. But this gives you an idea how easy it is for a company like BUK to handle one of the most serious of the conditions. Its actually quite a good overview. You ...more

328

Comment by bobsmith1on Aug 20, 2011 2:28pm

RE: RE: Message from BUK CEO

The conditions are standard as mentioned and in all actuality not that great even the nosie abatement is easily doable. Chesapeake Energy does it very well at their compressor stations.As for the ...more

260

Discussion