Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

Energy Oil & Gas E&P
"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."

Bullboard (GREY:LSTMF)

View:
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... Next
Comment by reefsandals4evaon Jan 26, 2017 12:03pm

RE:i'm going through public filings.

Okay, that was the sept,9 2016 management information circular.  That was refered to as the recapitalization plan.  this plan was thrown out in my opinion after the company went into CCAA. & ...more  
86
Discussion
Post by reefsandals4evaon Jan 26, 2017 11:43am

i'm going through public filings.

does anyone remember the 88 to 1 reverse split document? i 've been trying to find it everywhere but i can't seem to,  I'm starting to think i imagined it or was thinking of another ...more  
124
Discussion
Comment by Oldfart74on Jan 26, 2017 11:24am

RE:RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Pancho, I'm not trying to fool anyone.  I've provided my opinion based on my reading of the Monitor's report and the Court Order.  If the Monitor disagrees with your position, it ...more  
84
Discussion
Comment by Pancho2on Jan 26, 2017 10:45am

RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Oldfart74  "You have a vested interest in knowing whether or not you will receive shares in new entity.  Why don't you call the Monitor?  it's a simple question. You should ...more  
102
Discussion
Comment by Oldfart74on Jan 26, 2017 10:09am

RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

You have a vested interest in knowing whether or not you will receive shares in new entity.  Why don't you call the Monitor?  it's a simple question. You should get an answer.   ...more  
101
Discussion
Comment by wizthewizon Jan 25, 2017 9:14pm

RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Check out MVN if you want more of that kind of risk. Likely has a >100% upside in 2017. Or so they say! I am long and maybe sorry but that is the game. BOL
117
Discussion
Comment by reefsandals4evaon Jan 25, 2017 7:18pm

RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

I know. I'm in complete agreement now.  No deal is done until it's done.  I 'm having a few regrets , I should have bought more shares when they were getting dumped.   I ...more  
179
Discussion
Comment by Pancho2on Jan 25, 2017 6:57pm

RE:@bluesky sept 19

Reefs, From your posting of  LTS article from 19th Sept 2016, it clearly stated that if the  Support Agreement failed under the CBCA, then LTS is allowed to continue the proceedings under ...more  
150
Discussion
Comment by wizthewizon Jan 25, 2017 6:55pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Yes, I am inagreement with you on option #3 @bluesky, that is, if the statements in the Opression are accurate, Wright would have some explaining to do. All indicators point to some serious bait and ...more  
118
Discussion
Comment by reefsandals4evaon Jan 25, 2017 10:59am

RE:RE:@oldfart & oilman

I agree with that.  
81
Discussion
Comment by Oldfart74on Jan 25, 2017 10:47am

RE:@oldfart & oilman

I'm sorry if you feel I'm trying to bash the stock.  I've read the various documents and court decisions and am just expressing my opinion on what they mean.  You're unhappy ...more  
149
Discussion
Comment by Oldfart74on Jan 25, 2017 10:36am

RE:RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Remember the Mudrick lawsuit was filed in July 2015.  I felt they had a legitimate claim but at the end they lost.  The court decisions have clarified the law in complex situations such as ...more  
115
Discussion
Post by reefsandals4evaon Jan 25, 2017 10:34am

@oldfart & oilman

If you two could bash this stock for a couple days.....that would be great.
104
Discussion
Comment by BluSky23on Jan 25, 2017 9:56am

RE:RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

Who to go after. First thought is Adhoc Committee. But they threw out a decent offer in CBCA, and Muldrick took that out. So is Adhoc culpable of wrong doing? Second is Muldrick/Unsecured, they simply ...more  
138
Discussion
Comment by reefsandals4evaon Jan 24, 2017 3:00pm

RE:RE:@bluesky sept 19

in my opinion and this is only an opinion, in order to be a dissenting shareholder at this point you'd have to sell your shares. In CCAA you'd be part of the majority whether you like it or ...more  
181
Discussion
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... Next
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities