Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining... see more

Bullboard (GREY:CPYCF)

View:
Comment by mokitaon Apr 01, 2013 5:43pm

CEC bases robust economics on 2009 market

Another Rant:  although claiming commitment to povide uptodate, accurate information, CEC repeats on its Feb. 2013 updated  raven web fact sheet that  economics for Raven ...more  
Comment by 2guyson Apr 01, 2013 4:27pm

RE: RE: Re Walter Energy Shuts mine and charged w/

minor007, I agree with your post.   As for economics, I'm not sure how much the economics at Raven have changed, but if costs remain little changed, then whether it be Met or Thermal coal ...more  
Comment by minor007on Mar 31, 2013 2:00pm

RE: Re Walter Energy Shuts mine and charged w/ pol

The economics of the project change with the price of the commodity. It is quite likley this project will not get off the ground immediately even if approved. If the majority of the population dont ...more  
Comment by mokitaon Mar 29, 2013 11:20pm

Re Walter Energy Shuts mine and charged w/ polluti

Like CEC, Walter Energy promised over 300 jobs that will be lost when Willow Creek, which produces much higher quality coal than Raven, closes down. Why?  A  bust market, ...more  
Post by MOshowmeon Mar 28, 2013 10:49pm

Hi everyone

I am a long term CEC.V shareholder. I have seen it at 10 cents, then up to 60 cents, then back to 5 cents. I am holding on, because the company has good management, good backing, and although slowly ...more  
Comment by 2guyson Mar 28, 2013 9:44pm

RE: US exposes collusion between Teck and BC Gover

Good point mokita, and maybe one that you or any other contributing to the public comments period for Raven can bring up.   Even though Tech has nothing to do with Raven or Compliance Coal, you ...more  
Comment by mokitaon Mar 28, 2013 4:24pm

US exposes collusion between Teck and BC Governmen

Evidence of Teck coal mine poisoning of Elk River since 2008 exposes a coverup of astounding proportions on the part of the industry and government agencies involved.  For the thousands ...more  
Comment by mokitaon Mar 28, 2013 4:24pm

US exposes collusion between Teck and BC Governmen

Evidence of Teck coal mine poisoning of Elk River since 2008 exposes a coverup of astounding proportions on the part of the industry and government agencies involved.  For the thousands ...more  
Comment by chrisaleon Mar 28, 2013 11:31am

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: low

Of course a carbon tax would be passed onto consumers, that is the point 2guys, to encourage people, and business to supply, demand, produce and consume less CO2.  Any strategy that does not ...more  
Comment by 2guyson Mar 28, 2013 7:25am

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: low

Yes, I think that more money should be spent on monitoring, and if found that there needs to be more money spent on cleanup, then that expense should go to the miner, but I also believe that the bond ...more  
Comment by chrisaleon Mar 27, 2013 3:23pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: low

  #1:  "More money needs to be spent by the government to make sure that any foreseen or unforeseen clean up costs be addressed" If you mean that more money should be spent by ...more  
Comment by 2guyson Mar 27, 2013 9:37am

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: low

chrisale, I think with regards to any unforeseen clean up costs, the EAO should be on top of this with any mine after it's put into production.  More money needs to be spent by the government ...more  
Comment by chrisaleon Mar 26, 2013 6:13pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: low

That looks like 1 of the 3.  We also need to make sure the bond will clean up unforeseen (since they always seem to be) environmental problems resulting from the remain ants of the mine that were ...more  
Comment by 2guyson Mar 26, 2013 4:06pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: low

chrisale, I believe that is one of the requirements and CEC and its partners will need to put up a bond for any costs that may be required during and after it's run its course.   Reclamation ...more  
Comment by chrisaleon Mar 26, 2013 4:02pm

RE: RE: RE: low

I'm sure those asking for more studies, the regional district and local municipalities and bc shellfish growers association would not be opposed to such a bond IF the company also had a ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities