Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum AvenEx Energy Corp AVNDF

Energy Oil & Gas E&P

Bullboard (GREY:AVNDF)

View:
Prev ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... Next
Post by dave77on Feb 14, 2013 9:45am

re re 25.2

That's one of the problems with the plan Kherson...  we're diluting our value by taking on too much debt.
193
Comment by Khersonon Feb 14, 2013 8:05am

RE: 25.2 M

 Actually Dave77, the transaction costs are being flipped into long term debt... Kherson
195
Discussion
Post by dave77on Feb 13, 2013 11:24pm

25.2 M

$ 25 200 000 divided by 55 M Avenex shares outstanding ( we're the ones with the cash ) = $0.46/ share transaction costs !
255
Comment by Khersonon Feb 13, 2013 9:31pm

RE: Time is getting closer and closer........

Sadly ggrellette, I don't think management can come up with a better deal for anyone. If you can, get your hands on the latest edition of "Oil and Gas Inquirer". Robert Cooper of Haywood ...more  
261
Discussion
Comment by Kingscourton Feb 13, 2013 5:42pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

Pwalk, your info is much appreciated. I will maintain my reservations about the financials of this merger, however, your confidence and knowledge of this new management is comforting. I am led to ...more  
230
Discussion
Comment by Khersonon Feb 13, 2013 4:25pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: What happens

 Folks, I have given this merger idea alot of thought. I have been on the fence, fell off a few times on both sides of it, but today I made my decision and voted. Joe, I am with ya on this one,as ...more  
217
Discussion
Comment by pwalk140on Feb 13, 2013 3:19pm

RE: RE: What happens

And then you're still left with the same management team that everyone has been bashing on here.
167
Discussion
Comment by Khersonon Feb 13, 2013 3:01pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

Interesting: https://www.fiveforhowling.com/2013/2/4/3946874/could-bill-gallacher-save-the-phoenix-coyotes Kherson
159
Discussion
Comment by pwalk140on Feb 13, 2013 1:28pm

RE: RE: RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

There's always concern about not raising your expected captial, but with Charger the investment was with the management team. Their hope was for 140M, but that doesn't mean they didn't ...more  
172
Discussion
Comment by pennydredfulon Feb 13, 2013 1:05pm

RE: RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

Charger   tried  shortly  before  this  deal  to  raise   10M   at  about  .30    but   this  was ...more  
125
Discussion
Comment by Kingscourton Feb 13, 2013 12:52pm

RE: RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

Thanks very much for the info. Are you concerned that they didn't anticipate receiving less than half the funding they were hoping for? And if so, what are your concerns moving forward?
121
Discussion
Comment by pwalk140on Feb 13, 2013 12:03pm

RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

As with Charger, Tom and company did not come in until the deal in February 2012, closing March 2012. Due to the gas price and markets at the time they were hoping to raise $140+M but were only able ...more  
149
Discussion
Comment by pwalk140on Feb 13, 2013 11:59am

RE: RE: Merger may be only option.

The history on Provident: It was a upstream trust company that later acquired midstream assets and management, a hybrid if you will. With this formula there would be a constant supply of cash ...more  
148
Discussion
Comment by Kingscourton Feb 13, 2013 11:45am

RE: Merger may be only option.

pwalk, would you mind elaborating? I have been reading up on Buchanan's work at Provedent and see that he stepped down in 2010 before the stock could regain its 2005 levels. I was speaking more ...more  
147
Discussion
Comment by pennydredfulon Feb 13, 2013 11:38am

RE: What happens

Depending  on  how  much   is   gas  versus   oil  , operated  versus  non  operated    this  might   ...more  
147
Discussion
Prev ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... Next
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities