Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Renegade Petroleum Ltd V.RPL

Bullboard (TSXV:RPL)

View:
Comment by Seppelton Dec 27, 2013 6:43pm

RE:RE:RE:I am voting for Front Four for these reasons.

The current (7) members of the board, without Sharpe and Reid, own almost zero or very few shares of Renegade. Some can argue that the 'Special Committee' can't own shares ...more  
Comment by testy1on Dec 27, 2013 6:28pm

RE:RE:Front Four Phone Call

When I got the green proxy I read the material in the information circular.  Page 25 and 26.  I won't be voting for Front Four.
Comment by Seppelton Dec 27, 2013 5:34pm

RE:RE:Front Four Phone Call

Gentlemen, Most likely you called or received a call from CST Phoenix Advisors hired to handle FF's proxy. You may also get a call from Kingsdale Shareholder Services (I did) hired by RPL's ...more  
Comment by hawk35on Dec 27, 2013 5:20pm

RE:Front Four Phone Call

Ya I got a telemarketer call i half of Front Four and RPL.   Both were reading from a script.  I hung up on both part way through the call. 
Comment by makowtomon Dec 27, 2013 4:00pm

RE:Front Four Phone Call

Someone called me last night...went through the spiel that they represented over 8% of the shares.....I asked for: How many shares George and Dunfield personally had......she said that someone would ...more  
Comment by dividendguyon Dec 27, 2013 3:57pm

RE:Front Four Phone Call

Yes, By a communications company with a New Jersey number. (telemarketer I suspect) She asked to speak to me using my full name and said they are representing FrontFour and wanted to make sure I knew ...more  
Post by amp7on Dec 27, 2013 3:42pm

My take on FF proposal.

I too am not happy with the current board’s performance; IMHO, the process is taking too long, costs are going up and there is very little being done to grow the business in the interim. That said ...more  
Post by september36on Dec 27, 2013 3:27pm

Front Four Phone Call

Has anyone else been contacted by Front Four who are soliciting shareholder support?
Comment by Bean_and_Dunnon Dec 27, 2013 11:31am

RE:RE:I am voting for Front Four for these reasons.

Okay, to some extent a resource company has to hedge their production especially if they have a lot of debt. I will grant that, but do these professionals not have a better handle on the business than ...more  
Comment by september36on Dec 27, 2013 10:06am

RE:RE:Not Convinced By Front Four

I feel the same way. Why wouldn't FF have bailed months ago? Is not for control?
Comment by hawk35on Dec 27, 2013 9:36am

RE:Not Convinced By Front Four

Correction, meant to type 10K not 100K
Post by hawk35on Dec 26, 2013 10:31pm

Not Convinced By Front Four

By my standards, only a feel good plan coming from Front Four.  Nothing you can measure or take to the bank.  Not a fan of current management either but replace them with this bunch?  ...more  
Post by Winnipeg40on Dec 26, 2013 6:05pm

Benefits of Front Four

Their interests are tied to shareholders as large investors They have access to capital Rick George as a former Suncor CEO has access to ANYONE important in the oil patch Any responsible board would ...more  
Comment by makowtomon Dec 26, 2013 4:42pm

RE:I am voting for Front Four for these reasons.

Last year we were all happy that they signed half of their production for $90 or so ....that backfired and accounts for much of the loss.  I compare RPL to the others and NetBacks are very good - ...more  
Post by Bean_and_Dunnon Dec 26, 2013 12:24pm

I am voting for Front Four for these reasons.

SG&A costs jumped by from $4.61 to $6.06 per barrel. This is a hike of 31.4% in costs per barrel!   Expensed $4.2 million in share based compensation in the 9 month period. Pardon?That is ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities