RE: Jim and RodgerRodgersJim, you post that the moly property is OURS as investors, and supossedly you are being sued by SLI. Why wouldn't you DEMAND an explanation as per your investment. Oh I know, Because you are not invested in SLI at all. RIGHT. RodgerRodgers, you claim to be running on FREE shares: so what: Aren't you committed to protect your investment? The fact that both OR one of the SAME are both here tells me that you are here for your own personel agenda.:I;E; drive this stock lower to maximize your gains. And Jim don't post about the DRILLS getting started to anawer my question because you ALREADY know the answer to THAT question being the PRO you are. RIGHT> JMHO muskieman