TSXV:FCO.H - Post by User
Comment by
pcnisbeton Jan 03, 2006 6:22pm
164 Views
Post# 10109636
RE: Arsenic
RE: ArsenicWow
You really are that ignorant.
Read the article Rio. They are stating that if FCO disposed of its refinery products in deep water or highly acid conditions, the product would not be stable. They state that it is stable under given environmental conditions of storage.
Their concerns are about municipal water arsenic removal systems in which the tails will be disposed of as in Los Angeles in deep water settings or simply dropped in to microbe rich garbage dumps or into acid generating systems. None of those conditions pertain to FCO, so why are you trying to lay such claims.
If the 8000 foot peaks at Blackbird become inundated with deep water, we have a lot more than arsenic to be worrying about. As for the other two potential conditions under which they observe a lack of stability, which do you figure would happen? In a neutral buffered condition, who do the tails become acid? Do you figure that FCO is going to dump acid on the tails? Or are you assuming massive growth of water borne biota in dry staked tails?
As per norm, you post things by professionals that confirm the FCO position, yet act as if it’s a smoking gun. You need to consider staying away from Geochemistry, since you do not obviously know a darn thing about it and it seems to confuse you.