Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF



GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by aufeveron Feb 03, 2006 7:32pm
267 Views
Post# 10303102

sample

sampleI am no diamond expert, but here are a few thoughts on the sample. Bear in mind that it is like judging a gold deposit from a single assay out of a thousand meters of drill core. A few micros would show Mud Lake to be diamondiferous, but probably uneconomic. Macros are needed to show the potential for large stones. A dozen macros of assorted sizes would be very good. Just one stone of any size, say .05 carat, would be fantastic. No matter what, assuming it is diamondiferous, we need to wait for the bulk sample. The fact that this is a sill with potentially limited tonnage also must be kept in mind at this point. Thoughts anyone?
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse