Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Fabled Silver Gold Corp T.FCO


Primary Symbol: V.FCO.H Alternate Symbol(s):  FBSGF

Fabled Silver Gold Corp. is a Canada-based company. The Company is focused on identifying new opportunities.


TSXV:FCO.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by pcnisbeton Feb 13, 2006 9:00pm
218 Views
Post# 10360358

RE: Bankable feasibility

RE: Bankable feasibilityEhYou Nice paper. It deals with the vestment conditions which many juniors require in coming to terms for time of payment from the operating partner. As the lower of the two ones I posted, the requirement for a banking institution or other lender to consider something a "bankable" anything will happen on audit, just as this particular paper suggests. But nobody is going to audit a pre-feasibility and nobody is going to consider a feasibility final until its permits are issued and their weight can be added to insure that the study falls within the certainty criteria for an FFS. Rio's statements have claimed that FCO has to provide an FFS prior to getting a permit or completing the EIS process. Though they definately need to have a mine plan and to have moved to levels of data required for pre-feasibility, the kinds of economic analysis in a FFS is not required by the government, nor can it really be preformed without knowing what the environmental terms and conditions of the operation are to be. Why would you go to the expense of an FFS if the Feds were going to require alternate locations for you tailings or a different location for your portal or a larger water tresatment plant or a host of other environmental requirements that wold radically change the expenses of your operation?
Bullboard Posts
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse