Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

LGX Oil + Gas Inc ROAOF

LGX Oil & Gas Inc is a junior oil and gas company. The company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties. Its projects are in Southern Alberta. The company invests in all types of energy business-related assets, including petroleum and natural gas-related assets, gathering, processing, and transportation assets located in Western Canada. LGX is dedicated to delivering growth in reserves and production for its investors through land acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas resources.


GREY:ROAOF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by barsaxon Mar 09, 2006 1:23am
467 Views
Post# 10487330

RE: FWIW From another board...good 40

RE: FWIW From another board...good 40good40 wrote: "Proved reserves have a 90% chance of being recovered" Wrong. Proved reserves have a 90% probability of being greater than the amount stated. Probable reserves have a 50% probability of being greater than the number stated. good40's statement is mis-leading as per usual. His statement discounts the fact that there is a very good chance (90%) that the actual proved reserves in place are greater than the number stated, versus the notion that one has a 90% chance of recovering up to the proved number, but not beyond. He always leaves out the upside. Why? It's in his interest to do so. cheers barsax
Bullboard Posts