Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF



GREY:SCSZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by idleSpeculatoron Mar 19, 2006 7:16am
49 Views
Post# 10525370

RE: Spinner, you are right about Idle

RE: Spinner, you are right about IdleSPinner, You continue to demonstrate that 1) you don't understand english language 2) it is your intent to discredit anyone who my interfere with your attempts to lead a board 3) You have no qualms about lying. "Hopen it has become a real joke, he claims to his defence that the reason he did only inbox this was the "leaks" on the private board well there is a problem there.... he only found out about the "leaks" at the beginning of November yet he was sitting on this email since July......" Wrong SPinner, I sat on it becuase it was not relevant, T/SB was mothballed already compnay was focussed on Vivo. "He called on the people that leaked info for having a lack of integrity yet as soon as cymru disagreed with him on the private board he cut's and paste cymru's comments on the public board talk about the pot calling the kettle black. " 2 Lies, did not cut and paste Cmru, but I did refer to his post. As it was a personal attack rather than anything releated to the compnay it belongs here not $scs. The 2nd lie is that the lack of integrity related to the fact that people were not willig to come fporward and discuss passing info to you and hopeless. Many people read $scs no one else was given an opportunity to say whewther they would have preferred an open or a closed board, you mate decided unilaterally, and as a result meant most info was exchanged in inboxes, as it was before I ever joined this board. "He claims and in some ways you have agreed that he did not pump, I disagree sitting on this kind of info while posting on a regular basis is abusing confidence of other readers that come to believe they get the real and complete story as he possessed it." Spinner, need to do some homework on this. Email contained no new info, so couldn't be used as you said. And even if it could you need to go on and show I was pumping and the compnay or otherwise manipulting like you to have an argument. Bored of challenging you to show this, you keep failing,m just chucking out the same old lie of it must be true becuase you say so. You are a proven liar, what you say means nothing unless you back it up with facts. "He claims now that he has not sold at all in 2005, is that the story now or will he come out with an e-mail he sent back then telling the others it was time to bail?" Check with your contacts, see who I advised to bail in 2005. Then explain the relevance. the email contained no new info. Are you saying that on $WISE you do not share any DD at all, is it a complete vacant private board with no info on compnay, If not what exactly is your problem with anyone exchanging info by inbox anyway? "But that the likes of you and I did not do proper DD so we deserved to lose and weren't worthy of knowing." ANother fabricated lie, I simply want a forum to share information that discusses compnay objectively and doesn't indulge and get lost from the subject in constant personal attacks. Like what a few people here have done. Can'tr think of a single reason for sharing info with you morons. I only regret others are excluded as a result. "He claims the e-mail was irrelevant if so why does he bring it up now in a show of anger about management was it or was it not relevant? and if it was not when did it become relevant enough to use it as a way to make his point that he is angry towards management." Finally a question rather than a lie. Pity your guesses are wrong spinner, and I think I even explained, I canme accross it while cleaning out my yahoo account. "He comes here on the public board and post his resentment yet refuses to discuss the company. Several weeks ago I was pressing him to state his position has to SCS being a buy or a sell? he refused to answer....was he selling them this is 2006?" I don't discuss compnay with lying morons on this board, get used to it spinner. "He has lost it a long time ago and if the long time shareholders would set their emotions aside they would realised that the real discussions ought to happen here on the public board." Impossible when you and hopen launch into personal attacks whenever you hear any new info. Sad case of shoot the messenger.
Bullboard Posts