Uranium Economics, Global Warming, andthe need to mine uranium at all...congratulations CXX longs...I used to own this, bailed long ago...
Nice promo "Area 51" reminds me of "The Great Red Spot" in Botswana Fancamp ran up on a few years ago...
Global Warming remains generally accepted but unproven science by consensus...a convenient explanation for every weather pattern...
Long term there are several problems for uranium miners...among them:
As the U3O8 price goes up, the incentive rises to spend more on the necessary "enriching" of the natural isotope ratios from 0.71%U235:U238 and to 3.00%U235:U238 (U235 is the fissile isotope needed in thermal reactors).
Thermal reactors are by themselves a bad technology because they produce 100 tons/year/1,000 megawatts generating capacity of waste full of dangerous transuranic elements like plutonium 239 and americium with half lives of 10,000 years...the infamous storage problem...all types of reactors produce radioactive cesium 137 and strontium 90, safe after less than 500 years BUT soluable in water and therefore in need of very secure storage...
Despite bad politics, the future probably favours fast breeder reactors using full-pyrometallurgical-recycling eliminating the need to store the dangerous transuranics and also eliminating the need to mine uranium "for centuries"..."Smarter Use of Nuclear Waste" Scientific American, December 2005, page 90...
Nevertheless, good luck all, and the above won't happen overnight...