Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is an integrated mineral exploration and development company, which is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of rare earths elements (REE) mineral properties in Labrador. It focuses on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), Zirconium and Hafnium resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of South East Labrador. It controls two deposits (Foxtrot and Deep Fox), two drill ready prospects (Fox Meadow and Silver Fox) and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 km long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. It also controls additional CREE assets in the Red Wine District of central Labrador. These include the drill ready Two Tom Lake CREE-Be-Nb deposit, the Mann #1 CREE-Nb-Be prospect and Merlot CREE Prospect. The Two Tom Property includes mineral licenses 027358M and 016522M in Labrador, Canada. The Red Wine property is located 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by dismalscienceon Apr 05, 2006 7:34pm
200 Views
Post# 10628460

RE: Stock monetization

RE: Stock monetizationTanashine your little fairy tale is so flawed it reveals itself and doesn’t even deserve a response. As soon as I stop laughing, I’ll type one anyway. 1,2,3,…. There, I’m better now. First of all, when you transfer shares to someone for money in return, that’s called a sale, not a loan. Second, the “borrowing” institution doesn’t require such a transaction to short the stock. They can borrow it for shorting purposes without the owner’s permission or even knowledge for that matter. What you’ve described is an institution buying stock from an insider only to sell it at a loss. Not sure how the institution benefits from this. BTW, the voting rights go with the stock in a sale. But wait, last you say the money received from the institution for the “loan” by the insider is a loan also, so now the insider has to pay interest to the institution? NOW I get it: the institution just lends the money to the insider for the shares the insider lends to the institution. So I guess the insider has to pay back the money he received for lending the shares too. Wait, how does the insider benefit from that? Oh wait again, I get it: he gets his shares back, since he only loaned them in the first place and he pays back the money he received for loaning those shares to the institution along with interest. Now he’s got his shares back but they’re worthless, because the institution shorted the crap out of them while they had them in their possession. And he has to pay them interest, but at least it isn’t much. But then he’s also out the principal, namely the money he received for the shares in the first place at the “agreed upon price”. Seems to me the insider just paid someone to have his stock devalued without having to file with the authorities. Hmmm, still doesn’t make sense to me. Now I’m really confused… Anyway, not to waste any more time on such convoluted mental gymnastics, the one big flaw in your argument is that the company that holds the shares on Horowitz’s behalf is also an insider for SEDI filing purposes. It has to report transactions too. Maybe Wellington could approach Clifford with this kind of offer. I’m sure he’d go for it. Diz
Bullboard Posts