Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is an integrated mineral exploration and development company, which is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of rare earths elements (REE) mineral properties in Labrador. It focuses on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), Zirconium and Hafnium resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of South East Labrador. It controls two deposits (Foxtrot and Deep Fox), two drill ready prospects (Fox Meadow and Silver Fox) and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 km long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. It also controls additional CREE assets in the Red Wine District of central Labrador. These include the drill ready Two Tom Lake CREE-Be-Nb deposit, the Mann #1 CREE-Nb-Be prospect and Merlot CREE Prospect. The Two Tom Property includes mineral licenses 027358M and 016522M in Labrador, Canada. The Red Wine property is located 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by dismalscienceon Apr 06, 2006 12:42am
207 Views
Post# 10629600

RE: Stock monetization

RE: Stock monetizationTo the best of my knowledge, naked shorting is illegal everywhere, although how well it’s enforced is another matter. In emerging markets, e.g. Iraq, even what we in the West call legitimate shorting is illegal in order to help build investor confidence and participation in what are relativley new stock exchanges. It’s to assist the birth of free-market capitalism in emerging economies. After all, buying low and selling high is the most intuitive (easily understood and grasped) form of investing. In order to keep new money from timid newbie investors coming into the equity markets in these countries, prohibiting short selling makes perfect sense. For sophisticated short sellers, especially those with the power to move markets, to come in and basically take their money from them would ruin the equity market as a much-needed source of capital for companies trying to grow in such economies. One can argue the merits/demerits of short selling in mature markets such as ours. Advocates of short selling trot out such “benefits” as “keeping the market honest”, “mitigating irrational exuberance”, etc. Most advocates represent the interest of hedge funds, which number well over 7,000 by now in North America alone. Such arguments have intuitive appeal coming after the crazy tech bubble towards the turn of this century and aren’t without merit. But what’s not mentioned is the darker side of stock manipulation and naked shorting. I couldn’t find the post you mention describing naked shorting, but it’s accurate in its definition. We have no formal mechanism yet for exposing it in Canada, unlike Regulation SHO which went public in the US in January, 2005. We may have the means in place to detect it, but we need to follow suit to what they’ve done in the States in order to make this information visible to the investment community. I’d like to know your source or link to the SEC ban of Oct 29, 2003. The “critics” by the way are lame in the extreme with such a self-serving argument. They’re probably the same people that participated in the “micro-cap” crime wave and now that that’s been exposed, are defending their new way of exploiting the market. The 90’s was the decade of the boiler room (see the movie if you haven’t already) during which they profited from hype and greed. Now we’re in the decade of fear and fast-moving markets and these same crooks are working the market in the other direction. Diz
Bullboard Posts