Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is an integrated mineral exploration and development company, which is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of rare earths elements (REE) mineral properties in Labrador. It focuses on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), Zirconium and Hafnium resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of South East Labrador. It controls two deposits (Foxtrot and Deep Fox), two drill ready prospects (Fox Meadow and Silver Fox) and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 km long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. It also controls additional CREE assets in the Red Wine District of central Labrador. These include the drill ready Two Tom Lake CREE-Be-Nb deposit, the Mann #1 CREE-Nb-Be prospect and Merlot CREE Prospect. The Two Tom Property includes mineral licenses 027358M and 016522M in Labrador, Canada. The Red Wine property is located 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by dismalscienceon Apr 09, 2006 9:31pm
172 Views
Post# 10639704

Wellington -> jdn5

Wellington -> jdn5<< This could be an excercise in futility but if Wellington can be tied to this stinky mess it may be worthwhile. >> If a CA proceeds, Wellington’s an obvious choice in to include in a list of defendents, since it began with them. In fact the Samsys BoD should have considered litigation against them over their allegation of default. After all they PR’d a statement about resisting any action by Wellington in reliance on such allegation. Some “resistance”. The BoD behaved like a bunch of girls who when they say “no”, they really mean “yes”! My apologies for the sexist slur, but it seemed the most appropriate analogy for this situation.
Bullboard Posts