Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is an integrated mineral exploration and development company, which is focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of rare earths elements (REE) mineral properties in Labrador. It focuses on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), Zirconium and Hafnium resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of South East Labrador. It controls two deposits (Foxtrot and Deep Fox), two drill ready prospects (Fox Meadow and Silver Fox) and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 km long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. It also controls additional CREE assets in the Red Wine District of central Labrador. These include the drill ready Two Tom Lake CREE-Be-Nb deposit, the Mann #1 CREE-Nb-Be prospect and Merlot CREE Prospect. The Two Tom Property includes mineral licenses 027358M and 016522M in Labrador, Canada. The Red Wine property is located 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by dismalscienceon Apr 10, 2006 1:56pm
241 Views
Post# 10652978

Why shareholders were cut out of the deal

Why shareholders were cut out of the dealWith over 93M shares o/s already I suspect Sirit didn’t want the dilution a stock exchange would bring if Samsys shareholders were to be included. I imagine that would have been their only option as they can’t afford to pay out Samsys shareholders either – although at .025/share it would only cost them $1.3M now. Still why pay even that if you don’t have to? Let the market clear out the remaining shareholders who can sell to shorts covering. I mean really, who else was buying during the last days of trading? Seems clear now that Tom came on board at the beginning of this year to wind down the company despite his pronouncements suggesting the contrary. He was aware of the liquidity issues and debt structure from the day he arrived. As he told the Canadian Press a few weeks ago: "This is a challenge and an opportunity I've faced since the first day of coming here and we thought it was appropriate at this stage in the process to form this special committee." This was the best he could do? OK, maybe he thought otherwise at the beginning but something changed his mind. Still, absolutely no defense, or even an attempt at one, of shareholder value
Bullboard Posts