Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF



GREY:SCSZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by idleSpeculatoron Apr 12, 2006 5:09am
95 Views
Post# 10668465

RE: more bu ll from idle

RE: more bu ll from idleSpinner, you are truly losing it man. To assume that becuase I think you make one valid point does not imply I think everything you say is valid. This is a logic 101 error, namely "Proof by example" Here is another example of how ridiculous proof by example is spinspeak A blue car ran over my dog, therefore all blue cars run over dogs. Can you see how incredibly weak minded that logic is. SPinner wrote; ----- on the private board [idle] posts "In Spinner conspiracy racked mind, he actually made a valid point, you don't need to be a Bullboard Pro to open or administer a private board." but would not come clean on here and admit I make nothing but valid points ------ 0/10 Try harder next time
Bullboard Posts