Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Connacher Oil & Gas Ltd CLLZF

"Connacher Oil and Gas Ltd is an oil company engaged in the exploration and development, production and marketing of bitumen. Connacher holds two producing projects at Great Divide are known as Pod One and Algar."


GREY:CLLZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by righand99on May 09, 2006 6:38pm
631 Views
Post# 10824518

Major powers fail to agree on Iran

Major powers fail to agree on Iran Major powers fail to agree on Iran Tuesday 09 May 2006, 9:49 Makka Time, 6:49 GMT Monday's meeting was hosted by the US secretary of state Foreign ministers of major powers have failed to agree a strategy to deal with Iran during a late-night meeting in New York. Philippe Douste-Blazy, the French foreign minister, said the US-hosted meeting on Monday did not reach agreement. "We are still considering our work," he told reporters after the talks. An official who asked not be named said that "the prospects for an agreement this week are not substantially good". Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, hosted counterparts from Russia, Britain, France, China and Germany for talks that were also attended by Javier Solana, the European Union's foreign policy chief. While the immediate issue was Iran's nuclear programme, Sean McCormack, the US state department spokesman, said the discussions "were much broader", including terrorism and regional security. "The prospects for an agreement this week are not substantially good" US official Ministers refused to answer reporters' questions during a picture-taking session. But McCormack said the meeting went on longer than planned because "it's an indication that all the ministers take this issue seriously". Divisions Earlier, officials said Russia and China continued to resist a UN Security Council resolution sponsored by Britain and France and backed by the US that would legally require Iran to halt uranium enrichment. The meeting of the Security Council's five veto-wielding permanent members plus Germany and Solana came after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, wrote to the US president proposing "new ways" to resolve their differences. It was the first letter from an Iranian head of state to a US president since Washington broke off relations after the 1979 Islamic revolution. Sceptical US officials dismissed the 18-page letter as a diversionary tactic that did not address what it sees as a problem - Tehran's nuclear research. But a European diplomat who works on the Iran issue but was not authorised to speak publicly called the letter "another tactical masterstroke that was deliberately timed to come out today [before the ministers' meeting] and has made administration officials very nervous". Suspicion Washington and its allies suspect Iran of developing nuclear weapons. Tehran says its programme is to supply energy and is purely civilian. Earlier on Monday, China made clear that any reference to possible sanctions or war should be eliminated from the UN resolution ordering Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. Moscow and Beijing want a resolution but oppose invoking Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which is used routinely in Security Council resolutions for peacekeeping missions and other legally-binding actions. The United States, France and Britain insist on Chapter 7. It allows for sanctions and even war, but a separate resolution would be required to invoke further steps of that nature
Bullboard Posts