Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Strathmore Minerals Corp STHJF



GREY:STHJF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by presto10on Jun 24, 2006 10:14am
252 Views
Post# 11028788

How long before uranium catches

How long before uranium catchesthe average investor's attention? Compared to many, I was late to the game, but glad to have bought during the June swoon (plus long URE since Jan). For most investors it is not on the radar screens yet. My increased exposure to uranium was a DIRECT result of reading Eric Sprott's 40 odd page detailed report on the reality of global warming and nuclear energy. It was entitled something like 'Investment Implications from Changing Weather....'. Some people still don't think that people landed on the moon; many Russians think they invented the automobile. Some people can't connect dots, lol! Sprott's EXTREMELY COMPELLING and frightening article (which is no longer available - I tried the link off the EMC board and it didn't work last week) made buying into STM a no brainer investment. Accordingly visiting the STM booth was a high priority for me at a recent investment conference. Then again, we can't be unconcerned about the proliferation of nuke power and the resulting nuclear waste problem. In the wrong hands.... STM's David Miller claims that in 500 years nuclear waste is not dangerous at all and that requiring safe storage with the 1 million year storage test (nuclear waste) is total overkill. A poor choice of words, I think. What can ya do but to find out more, increase others' awareness and buy more STM? https://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=OBR&Date=20060623&ID=5819032
Bullboard Posts