Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mercator Minerals Ltd MLKKF

Mercator Minerals, Ltd. is a mineral resource company engaged in the mining, exploration, development and operation of its mineral properties in Arizona, United States and Sonora, Mexico. The Company’s principal assets are the 100% owned Mineral Park Mine, a producing copper-moly mine located near Kingman, Arizona and the El Pilar Project located in Sonora Mexico. The primary focus of the Company is the expansion of copper production and molybdenum concentrate production at the Mineral Park Mine, and the development of the El Pilar Project. Its other projects include The El Creston molybdenum property, which is 175 kilometers south of the United States Border and 145 kilometers northeast of the city of Hermosillo; Molybrook, which is located on the south coast of Newfoundland, and Ajax, which is located 13 kilometers north of Alice Arm, British Columbia.


GREY:MLKKF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by 24~Karaton Sep 29, 2006 8:25pm
408 Views
Post# 11442619

Asarco Should Be Sued.

Asarco Should Be Sued.This matter has been addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court, where they were reviewing the fairness of a sale price received for an asset that was under the duress of foreclosure. But Asarco was not under the duress of foreclosure, but they instead disposed of their asset in a free and open market. Here is the an excerpt from the Supreme Court’s decision: “To specify a federal minimum sale price beyond what state foreclosure law requires would extend bankruptcy law well beyond the traditional field of fraudulent transfers and upset the coexistence that fraudulent transfer law and foreclosure law have enjoyed for over 400 years. While, under fraudulent transfer law, a "grossly inadequate price" raises a rebuttable presumption of actual fraudulent intent, it is black letter foreclosure law that, when a State's procedures are followed, the mere inadequacy of a foreclosure sale price is no basis for setting the sale aside.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1370.ZS.html There you have it. It is called “settled law.” Beyond dispute. ASARCO should be sued for this brazen attempt at extortion. They have plenty of assets that could be attached for the damages they have caused. It just depends in which cookie jar you look. According to Wikipedia: “One stated reason for (Asarco) declaring bankruptcy was the number of pending lawsuits. Asarco had more than 100 civil environmental cases pending against it when it filed for bankruptcy. Prior to the bankruptcy, Asarco transferred much of its assets to a shell company set up by Grupo México. A few months after Asarco's bankruptcy, Grupo México announced that net profits had doubled, in large part because of the removal of Asarco's environmental liabilities.” _____________________________________ As to the incorrect assertion by CalifDreaming that Asarco has some element of the law on their side, I think he needs review the post (linked below) by Kauaicat, where he demonstrates that “This law is in place to prevent fraudulent conveyances” https://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=13163213&t=0&all=0&TableID=0
Bullboard Posts