FreedomDon't get me wrong. I am a shareholder here and fully expect to make some money this week. However I am no geologist and have a great deal of diffuclty with terminology.
Just because ARU and SKE have epithermal gold zones does not make them equal it would seem to me. If we have silicaceous breccia and ARU has high sulfide ore bodies it would appear that our deposit spread out from the mantle like a spider web with a multitude of veins who's width, depth and grade have yet to be determined and will require many many holes. In contrast my idea of the ARU deposit is one of a large melting pot, high in sulfides which raapidly cooled. Thus the very long somewhat homogenous drill holes.
Now some of the least cost mines operate in the system of breccia and veins. The lower plate rocks of the Robertson formation in Nevada come to mind. However my point is that if the market expects to see 200m intercepts they might be dissapointed.
As I am not a geologist perhaps you culd clarify these points.
PS I will be looking to add to my position once I see the first few drill holes.
Here's to tomorrow
Rick The Vet