Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Pauly79on Oct 18, 2006 10:14am
198 Views
Post# 11519638

RE: Bobby, why so negative?/

RE: Bobby, why so negative?/All these NRs are essentially useless - just little updates. What NAG needs is to focus on getting indicated and measure resource estimates for LL. If they think the property is so great, hurry up with the program and get some numbers out that can actually be used for forecasting. Nobody cares about 'inferred' numbers. I'd rather see them put 100% of their effort towards one property rather than splitting their focus on LL, Whiskey, Mt. Ogden, Western Basin, etc. PLUS Solitaire Minerals properties. Talk about over-extending. I've been holding NAG for over a year and have accumulated more and more shares over this period. I've been traditionally pro-NAG, but management seems quite incompetent thus far, with little hope of things turning around. C'mon NAG, you've got a couple of months to shape up before I dump my shares.
Bullboard Posts