Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kure Technologies Inc V.KUR.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  UBSBF

Kure Technologies, Inc. is a Canada-based company. The Company has no business activity. The Company's subsidiary is UBS Wireless Services Inc.


TSXV:KUR.H - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by ErickSodhion Jan 05, 2000 3:50pm
500 Views
Post# 1195764

RE: Some technical comments

RE: Some technical commentsMy comments post # 82736 (comments from Nortel person): NT person said: "UBS products are basically for satellite communication subsystems." I tend to disagree with this remark. Granted, UBS deals with TWTAs, SSPAs, etc... but that doesn't mean that the rest of the product line is limited to satellite applications. I don't see why terrestrial microwave and wired services should be excluded. What about DAB? NT person said: "I don't think they can compete with companies like SPAR, SR Telecom or Hughes for their products." I don't think SPAR, SR Telecom and Hughes are in the same business as UBS. There may be a small overlap. Why would HNS want to partner with UBS if it was a competitor. Does this person really know what any of these companies does? NT person said: "Their products can supply to a very small satelite data market. Int'l Data is one example" I think they're talking about VSATs here (very small aperture terminals), a market which IDC serves very well, as does HNS. How this person makes the connection between VSATs and UBS's thrust is beyond me. The last couple of paragraphs lead me to believe that the Nortel person has no clue about DAB and therefore is not qualified to be passing any technical judgement on UBS. I'm not even sure that this person fully understands what's going on in the current cellular world. The conclusion that there isn't much potential for UBS is a load of crock since it appears that the writer has attempted to analyze UBS in the context of the cellular world. 'Nuff said.
Bullboard Posts