Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Haviland Enviro Corp V.HEC


Primary Symbol: V.HEC.P

Haviland Enviro Corp. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The principal business of the Company is the identification and evaluation of assets or businesses with a view to completing a qualifying transaction. The Company has not commenced its business operations and has not generate any revenue.


TSXV:HEC.P - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by stockman6767on Jan 08, 2007 12:14pm
207 Views
Post# 11973088

Hemosol, Melnyk and Catalyst

Hemosol, Melnyk and CatalystNow that two deep pockets are both trying to buy Hemosol, why doesn't the Court let them bid against each other for the prize, rather than giving it away for pennies on the dollar? That way perhaps there would be a little left for the poor equity shareholders so that their nest egg and retirement savings isn't completely wiped out? It seems that the Court should be interested in the public's recovery of some of their investment and not allow the vultures circling to make huge profits at the publics interest. A ruling by the Court in the favor of either party (Melnyk or Catalyst) would be a pure give-away at the public expence (of the shareholders). A ruling not favoring either party, but leaving the prize to the highest bidder would be the faitest path and maximize the recovery for all the creditors and possibly leave something on the table for the poor investor.
Bullboard Posts