Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by trikenon Feb 21, 2007 12:10pm
131 Views
Post# 12279242

RE: Three NI 43-101 projects

RE: Three NI 43-101 projects Larix, The long term debt is secured against the substantial asset of the Tirisano mine which is mothballed due to the incompetent management of Transhex, this mine is not included in the proposed spin-off of Etruscan Diamonds and has therefore not been included in my NAV. Other long term debt $488k has to be balanced against $1.7 million raised since Oct (not taken into account in the NAV, but the diluted shares have been) I consistently low-ball estimates, if the SP shoots up, although gratifying, my buying opportunity vanishes. But going back to VL, this is a 27km. claim. The NI 43-101 estimate was for one location and for example did not take into consideration the drill hole 13km. away that had decent results including 31g/t over 1m.
Bullboard Posts