Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sama Resources Inc V.SME

Alternate Symbol(s):  SAMMF

Sama Resources Inc. is a Canada-based resource company. The Company is focused on exploring the Samapleu nickel-copper project in Cote d’Ivoire, West Africa. The Company’s projects are located approximately 600 kilometers (km) northwest of Abidjan in Cote d’Ivoire and are flanked to the west by the Ivorian and Guinean borders. Its projects are located adjacent to the nickel-cobalt laterite deposits of Sipilou and Foungouesso, forming a 125 km-long new Base Metal Camp in West Africa. Its property includes Samapleu Property, Zeregouine property, Grata Property, and Zoupleu Property. Its Grata Property is located adjacent to the north-eastern boundary of the Samapleu Property. Its Grata Property covers 92 square kilometers of property in Cote d’Ivoire. The Company's subsidiaries include Sama Nickel Corporation, Sama Nickel Cote d’Ivoire SARL, Societe Miniere du Tonkpi SARL, SRQ Resources Inc., Sama Resources Development Inc., and Sama Resources Liberia Inc.


TSXV:SME - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by allmineon Mar 12, 2007 6:57pm
213 Views
Post# 12404752

RE: Vote "NO"???

RE: Vote "NO"???Good point, and very well put. We do have to wonder why management is completely backing this 100%, hopefully they have thought this through completely, or they may have some information that we are not yet aware of. The other issue is of course the "alternative" what is it? Could it be worse than the dilution? Obviously the company feels it needs a "Yes" vote and will have a contingency plan in place in the event of a "No". I can only assume that every contingency plan they have is somehow worse or they would not push this.
Bullboard Posts