Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Portex Minerals Inc STACF

Strategic Resources is a Canada based development company focused on vanadium, high purity iron & titanium, metals necessary for decarbonizing the global economy. The company¿s key projects are the construction ready BlackRock project in Quebec & the past producing Mustavaara mine in Finland. Strategic is working to secure a financing package to commence construction on the BlackRock project. Orion Mine Finance and Investissement Québec, both 41% shareholders of Strategic will form a key part of the planned financing package.


GREY:STACF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Kruzer70on Mar 17, 2007 5:57pm
145 Views
Post# 12437819

RE: You''''ve missed the point altogether.

RE: You''''ve missed the point altogether. "First off if Yukon Zinc was Mexican Zinc with the same deposit the share price would be between $2.00 and $4.00." I don't know how this is relavent. "But the fact is YZC will actually have real profit, real cash flow and be making real money not some BS 200tpd operation losing money and promising the moon to stupid investors who don't have a clue." Tell that investors who have held YZC for the past year and now need a 300% RETURN just to break even. No, I've never owned YZC or even heard of it until I bought PAX. Its a real deposit, with real mining profit. Jeez you guys, take a look at other silver producers and YZC is better than almost all of them. It took a horrible hit but when the financing is done and we get forward earnings guidence I think you'll see one hell of a lot better mine and cash position than many Mexican silver miners with almost as many shares or more and NO profit, just fudged numbers from lol mining tailings! Yes YZC, better mine, great deposit and one crappy share price. You'd be better off working for YZC than owning it. By the way would you mind providing some actual names of silver companies you are talking about? But whatever, this is the PAX forum and the only reason I bring up Yukon Zinc is we share management, the same management that will put Wolvering into production, a very nice cash cow I might add and the very same management that put together the Howards Pass / Selwyn Project from virtually nothing, recognizing at the time what a tremendous opportunity it was. Wolverine had better generate STUPENDOUS cash flow inorder to generate earnings on a per share basis. One mine going into production with Barclays as the lead and quite likely the biggest zinc / lead deposit in the world with only 135 mil OS as of yet and a full years exploration / drilling budget in the bank? Who the hell are you lying BS artists trying to kid HM is a loser and has to go? BS artist, high praise comming from a master. Everytime I hear one of you say 'only 135 mil SO' I have to chukle. PAX is in maybe the second inning of development and they already have more shares outstanding than NovaGold who are much further along having two deposits nearing development. Wheras the team at YZC had to spin out PAX or the float whould have been asternomical. NDM is also much further along in development of an elphant deposit and has less SO than PAX. I will be the first to admit that NG and NDM are not fair comparisons to PAX but I only sight them as they have been sighted by cheerleaders on this board first. As for management, I've only seen one person post 'HM must go' and I suspect he is being a bit of a smart A$$. If there is one person who should go it is our IR person and I base this only on the total and absolute lack of promotion we are getting. Except for the trade shows she is completely invisible. If HM thinks promotion is unimportant then I think questions about his performance are legit. Look, if you want to cut through all the BS simply look at the stock charts for both YZC and PAX. As a sharholder in PAX I have every right to state my opinion on how this company is managed and I think the comments as to 'HM being better suited to a technical role' are totaly legit. GLTA ttfn nopoo
Bullboard Posts