GREY:BHNGF - Post by User
Comment by
deninsaskon Mar 24, 2007 2:54pm
201 Views
Post# 12482741
RE: IF GEM finds weapon grade U.....johnestromjr
RE: IF GEM finds weapon grade U.....johnestromjr
You seem to have a problem comprehending the written word when quoted from reliable and Expert sources......
It was Mike Hailstone who was quoted .....he is the Resident Geologist from Sault Ste. Marie Division of The Ontario Geological Survey (OGS).
I would contend that if you have a problem with the way he describes the material found in his District now and in the past that you lodge a complaint with his bosses.
It is apparent you have not read the NI43-101 Technical Report as well because within it the fact that Peles Claims hold promise for material that is a good candidate for Secondary Enrichment is discussed in a couple of places. I suggest you read the Report before you make a complete fool of yourself. Or perhaps you are smarter on this subject than the folks at Scott Wilson RoscoePA
Heres a link to a post you should read with more links that you should investigate....
https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=14521395&t=0&all=0&TableID=0
The property we got from Canalaska had two Drill Holes that averaged 0.45% or 9lbs.ton........is this why Scott Wilson discusses Secondary Enrichment in the 43-101?????