Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Wheels Group Inc GRFJF



GREY:GRFJF - Post by User

Post by loantech1on Mar 27, 2007 1:45pm
314 Views
Post# 12497856

Wgdf/wgi May Have A Bright Future And Higher

Wgdf/wgi May Have A Bright Future And Higher Production Numbers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some rough numbers on WGDF/WGI. They are permitted to move 60,000,000 tons of dirt per year. They have an average strip ratio of 2.7:1. So you are left with about 22,222,222 tons of ore. WGI may have used a number of about 76% recovery for the gold and may have used about 35% for recovery of the non-0xide gold ore in their BFS. But But! Newmont's metalurgy tests showed recovery of over 80% including the non oxide.See WGDF's corporate presentation. https://www.westerngoldfields.com/i/p...esentation.pdf The average grade is .017 ounces per ton. So 22,222,222 tons of ore (guesstimate)times .017 ounces leaves 377,777 ounces of gold with an 80% recovery (guesstimate)= 282,287 ounces produced per year not 165,000. If these numbers are correct and we use 650 gold instead of 500 gold in their base case WGDF may have a very bright future. 650 gold price using the lower production numbers per year equates to about a 42% IRR. Would be much higher with the higher production numbers. Do your own DD these numbers are for fun only.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>