Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

IIE:CA V.IIE



TSXV:IIE - Post by User

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Post by Tommer3on Apr 11, 2007 7:21pm
232 Views
Post# 12589792

Question on Iciena / Chuck Fipke Claims

Question on Iciena / Chuck Fipke Claims**** ATTEMPTED TO SHOW CLAIMS **** Here is a Map of Brazil. Iciena Properties: Close to State of Mato Grosso The Company holds a commanding 175,000-hectare property position in the Paranatinga diamond kimberlite field of Brazil that contains more than 40 known kimberlite pipes. (see attached map) The Company also holds an undivided 20% interest in more than 120,000 hectares in the Batovi Property operated by Chuck Fipke which adjoins the Company's Paranatinga Property. Note: I can not figure out where Chucks claims are other then they are adjoining.... just like in the the past he used coded terminology... Any one know where the other 120,000 hectare property is?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>