Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kore Mining Ltd V.KORE

Alternate Symbol(s):  KOREF

KORE Mining Ltd. is a Canada-based company, which is focused on responsibly creating value from its portfolio of gold assets in California, United States. The Company is advancing the Imperial project towards development while continuing to explore across both district-scale gold assets. It owns 100% of the Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District which consists of approximately 31,000 acres of claims capturing the entire 28-kilometer trend from the operating Mesquite mine to the closed Picacho mine and including its Imperial project. In the District, gold is hosted in local fault structures related to a series of regional faults connecting the known District deposits. Long Valley is the Company’s 100% owned epithermal gold and silver project located in Mono County, California. The 15,965-acre land package around the project is district in scale and covers all deep-rooted fault structures of similar genesis to the Hilton Creek fault, the primary conduit for the current Long Valley deposit.


TSXV:KORE - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by rise1on Apr 28, 2007 12:15am
193 Views
Post# 12690549

... an efficient market ...

... an efficient market ...... based on my math used to calculate the IPV (Implied Present Value) of Frasergold, Eureka's share price should trade at 56% of the value of Hawthorne's share price. My IPV calculations are based on: Eureka Fully Diluted Shares 13,852,640 40% Carried Interest in Frasergold Nil working Capital Zero Value Assinged to Eureka's Lottie Lake Property Hawthorne Fully Diluted Shares 12,499,500 60% Interest (not vested) $1,875,000 Working Capital ($0.15/share in cash) Zero Value Assinged to Hawthorne's Carruther's Pass Property ... Low and behold, the market is efficient ... Eureka at $0.81/share is 57% of Hawthorne's closing price of $1.42/share. So, if my IPV calculations are correct, if Hawthorne jumps to $2.00/share like vicsmith suggest it should, then Eureka should jump to $1.12/share. Does naybody else out there see flaws with mycalculations? Do your own due diligence first. rise1
Bullboard Posts