presto10I can't let that go. You last post just illustrated what has bothered me all along with the GW debate.Every time someone disagrees with the AGW crowed they are insulted and called idiots. Comparing people who have legitimate problems with the science of man made global warming with holocaust deniers is truley low. As someone who has had the horrific experience of visiting a Nazi Concentration camp I can tell you the holocaust did happen
Every time a legitimate scientist takes any opinion against the orthodoxy of the AGW crowd they are either branded as schill's of big oil or compared to other conspiracy nuts.
No one debates the world has warmed since the mini ice age. Saying it is due to man made CO2 emmisions is a huge leap. Saying it will continue unabated is a bigger leap. Complex computer simulations designed by some scientists say it will. Other scientists disagree and feel the evidence points to the current warming being mostly natural and not of unprecidented proportions. They feel the concept of some magic tipping point is nonsense.
What is wrong with having this debate. When you disagreed with me I complimented you for referencing your arguments. I did not insult you and say you believed everything you read fram a media that is clearly interested in gaining readership by claiming crisis where one doesny exist. I certainly didn't call you and idiot like you just did to me by comparing my opinion on a hotly contested scientific topic with those who believe what was likely the worst,most systematic mass murder in history didn't occur.