RE: Raulston RECOMMENDED CQR (2003)!Nothing in the Red text you sight backs up your accussation that LR is paid by the companies or offered shares to include them in his newsletter. I don't need your HUMBLEST APOLOGIES. I'm not the one you slandered with that statement. There is no doubt that one should not by any stock based on his publications alone but he does provide good information on the geological merits of a property.
Your point about not blindly investing based on newsletter recommendations is valid but is easily lost in your ranting.
Also, you come on here saying 'I told you so' sighting post you made in December about this being a POS?? In December the stock was at 0.60 today it is around $1.20 so you have a very interesting definition of POS.