RE: Another JF SB recommendation/canada 7The swedish text you cited "POWERTECH (PWE) [2007-05-17 12:50]
Nu fick POWERTECH sitt efterlängtade (och av många betvivlade att dom skulle få) prospekteringsborrningstillstånd i South Dakota"
...translates to something like this :
"Now Powertech received their longed for (and by many doubted they would receive) exploration program permit in South Dakota"
This is of course a false statement, since the permit was acknowledged in a news release from Powertech dated January 19.
https://www.powertechuranium.com/s/NewsReleases.asp?ReportID=167239&_Type=News-Releases&_Title=Powertech-Receives-Exploration-Permit-for-Dewey-Burdock-Project
I don´t know why "Jordan fund" wrote that, but it was immediately used at the Swedish biggest forum to pump up the premarket pressure of the stock, while I later was called names etc for undressing that statement...
The number one pumper SCORkungen probably didn´t understand the mistake himself though, since he also thought that PWE eventually had got rid of the "environmental hippies" or what you could use in english language when refering to them in a less beneign way.
His second mistake was that they were opposing another project, the Centennial where they still are opposing the project as far as I have seen on the Internet.