NORTHERN SUN MINING CORP LBEFF

This belongs here...

[marketminer]

The lack of class is with millright.... You think you can namecall and insinuate whatever you like... you throw out the sheit like you say, but when it gets replied to you get all worked up... You are the one going back 3 years and reposting time dated facts.... Everything changes with time... except you.... you will always be a moron...JMHO I bet Tom and Gary would like to tell you to shut up... why don't you ask them. -------------------------------------------------------------- Millrights post on FNI: Well marketmoaner, I see you want to continue with this, so here it is. Your post on LBE forum: "You seam to forget that Gary, Tom and I were all privy to the same information back then.... so don't call me an azz kisser/// there were plenty of lips to go arround...You also forget that Gary and I were togther when we visited the properties. I think you should take the personal stuff out of your posts as I'm sure managment wouldn't like you insinuating dirty laundry and spreading it all over the place.... You never have learned when to shut up have you... and as I said if you keep making this personal... I will also post here as well...." First of all I didn't call you an azz kisser - so I guess that's your description of the position you're trying to defend. How can I forget what I never knew. I didn't forget anything about who may have been privy to what information - I did not participate in the forum [other than one irrelevant post] until months after your pal was booted from the CEO position. Neither do I know, or care, whether you went with Gary or anyone else on a tour of the properties. You're quite the hypocrite - you say I should take the personal stuff out of the posts - when you are implicating a number of real life personalities in your allegations [and in the posts which I first responded to]. My comments are directed to your former and present anonymous alias. A little difference there dudley! Something you might think about from a legal standpoint when implicating real individuals from the protection of your anonymity. You are exposing yourself to some serious legal implications, and you show a complete lack of class and guts in spreading personal matters around a chatroom. You whine about attacks on your anonymous alias, by someone you can at least respond to on a level playing field. How do you think these people you are implicating feel? What avenue do you think they should choose to defend themselves? At one time you threatened to make trouble for everyone involved if I did not back off your whining about loss of inside information. That seems to be your gutless way - heap your illiterate drivel on everyone in sight, because you don't like how one poster talks about your alias. Threaten to involve people that have no control over my actions, because you can't defend what "dudleydog" or "marketminer" are challenged on in a chatroom. I would bet that those people you are slandering would have enough common sense and class not to divulge your identity in a chatroom. From what you say, you've reached the age of manhood - grow up and start acting like one. If you want to keep this up, have at it dudley. Just a suggestion, have a little discussion with a lawyer as to the implications of slandering an alias - versus slandering real persons. Ask him if its wise for you to admit to receiving preferred knowledge from the insider you have named, and whether your alias will protect you from identification by authorities. The ball is back in your court, marketminor.