Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

IIE:CA V.IIE



TSXV:IIE - Post by User

IIE:CA > Iciena’s Benchmark vs. Peers June 02, 2007
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by Pennypicker4on Jun 02, 2007 11:32am
214 Views
Post# 12882001

RE: Iciena’s Benchmark vs. Peers June 02, 2007

RE: Iciena’s Benchmark vs. Peers June 02, 2007Excellent update Tommer...Thanks. Find it somewhat strange that there has been no "Insider selling" reported when the biggest seller is "Anonymous" which , as I understand, is often used for "insider selling". Is it possible that certain Insiders may not be aware that they are required to report their purchases and sales ? Or could their trading be indirect thru relatives etc?
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities