Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Gold Canyon Resources Inc V.GCU



TSXV:GCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by coach247on Jun 04, 2007 2:53pm
444 Views
Post# 12888222

RE: DID U ALSO KNOW THAT----

RE: DID U ALSO KNOW THAT----Hi Clumphead! Last year I asked about the potential for epithermal gold on the project, if they drilled below the gallium deposit, and I was told at the time that the original property vendor Placer Dome (now Barrick) has the rights to any precious metals deposits, and that GCU only has the rights for the gallium and REEs in their control. Perhaps this has changed but it is something that should be confirmed. I would agree that there is a strong likelihood that some form of gold/silver/copper deposit may exist at depth. The magnesium staining in the mineralization near surface, along with the antimony/mercury in the system, suggests this could be the upper elevation of a strong alteration system, and that the heavier metals would be found to depth. cheers! COACH247
Bullboard Posts