Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by skydanceron Jun 05, 2007 11:22am
384 Views
Post# 12893033

SRK Consulting

SRK ConsultingThe revised report by SRK will be the key to properly evaluate NAG's L Lake resources. What I found interesting in the new report just out was that they had suggested that 14 holes were needed to change much of the inferred tonnes to indicated and that NAG had completed 7 of them. The revised tonnage and grades should be better than Brenda Mines was. I have to question some of the statements made by Fundamental when I read that Brenda Mines was just out of Kamloops when in fact it is just out of Peachland in the Okanagan Valley approx 150 Kilometers to the southeast.
Bullboard Posts