GREY:RGVNF - Post by User
Comment by
HOBACon Jun 26, 2007 8:40pm
160 Views
Post# 13002988
RE: Better - ICEBERGS?
RE: Better - ICEBERGS?UM?
You said today "Pay closer attention to the iceberg buys (a novel idea when it comes to REV).", then you say again
"Yes, those litle (i)'s next to orders last week were all an illusion.".
Oh boy, are you ever confused, I said no icebergs today and I don't flip flop you could easily take place of RW with that type flip flopping. Let me make it perfectly clear "NO ICEBERGS TODAY". As far as last week goes houses were exchanging stocks and mainpulating as usual, including ANONYMOUS. By the way who is ANONYMOUS, I just can't figure it out after a year of holding this stock.
Yes, I am just hoping they can finish one job at least instead of throwing cash in new advantures called "unknowns". I think I will stop here, the rest is well known. Let's get the main deal going instead of spending energy and money in new advantures.