G34Greg 34 "Yes but you keep replying thinking that everyone is implying that Sprott = SAM when clearly that is not the case because some are just referring to house positions."
Actually Greg, I've made one wisecrack about the subject and one reply to your post and thats it. Realize that you've have talked on the subject as much or more than I have. I still stand by my opinion that most of the posters who put "Sprott buying" in the subject line are implying SAM is buying. The only exception I've seen recently is PIB who clearly made the distiction in the body of his text.
Greg34 "Realize that you are not helping anyone with your garbage posts Kruzer70,"
LOL, you have an interesting standard regarding garbage posts. I find posts regrarding house positions and who's buying alot more relevant than you posting your latest conipition. In the last little while you've bashed the stock, you've pumped the stock. You've threatened to smash your monitor, your keybord and toss your gear out a 3rd story window. Promises, prosmises. All very entertaining but not very usefull.
Greg34: "Nobody gives a $hit whether its Sprott Cormarck, so stop making such a big deal."
Your statment is completely wrong. It would be a very big deal to this stock if SAM was taking a position.
Too bad this stock isn't giving us anything better to talk about other than all this tangental gargabe. Awhile back someone posted that we were in for an interesting June. Speaking of broken promises.