Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Leeward Capital Corp LEWCF



GREY:LEWCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Bentonstockson Jul 05, 2007 11:22pm
270 Views
Post# 13044763

Numbers & Perspective...

Numbers & Perspective...The first date set below is comprised of the entire drill results of the recent NR, with my totals. If you look at the bottom you will see that there is a total 907.2m with an avergae grade of Mo% 0.037630732. However, if you look at the second data set, which excludes the two very long intersections of 143.2m grading Mo% 0.032 and 194.2m grading Mo% 0.031 in DDHs G0705 and G0706 respectively, you will see that we have a less skewd (by the much longer intersections of Mo% 0.031/2) average of Mo% 0.041305721 over 569.8m. What's my point? When I was speaking to Davis, he lamented the fact that his full disclosure of the results skewd the average downwards when other company's may have opted to present the results more selectively to show a higher avergae Mo%. You can take that different ways, but I like the fact that the results we have present an undistorted picture of Gamma, and I appreciate the non-'promotional' or 'hypster' ethic of Davis. I also like the fact that all of the holes are hitting econmomic Mo% at 50m spacing with little variation in width except for the two very long intersections (bigger is better anyway) and that this mineralization has been traced along strike for 1500m, AND REMAINS OPEN. Interval (m) Mo% Total Mo% Avg. Mo 60.9 0.031 1.8879 6.1 0.063 0.3843 51.8 0.031 1.6058 88.4 0.031 2.7404 11.5 0.061 0.7015 11.3 0.034 0.3842 39.6 0.034 1.3464 87.5 0.055 4.8125 15.2 0.086 1.3072 143.2 0.032 4.5824 36.6 0.042 1.5372 194.2 0.031 6.0202 15.2 0.047 0.7144 48.7 0.036 1.7532 27.2 0.031 0.8432 12 0.043 0.516 39.5 0.057 2.2515 18.3 0.041 0.7503 Total 907.2 34.1386 0.037630732 Interval (m) Mo% Total Mo% Avg. Mo% 60.9 0.031 1.8879 6.1 0.063 0.3843 51.8 0.031 1.6058 88.4 0.031 2.7404 11.5 0.061 0.7015 11.3 0.034 0.3842 39.6 0.034 1.3464 87.5 0.055 4.8125 15.2 0.086 1.3072 36.6 0.042 1.5372 15.2 0.047 0.7144 48.7 0.036 1.7532 27.2 0.031 0.8432 12 0.043 0.516 39.5 0.057 2.2515 18.3 0.041 0.7503 Total 569.8 23.536 0.041305721 Regards, Bentonstocks
Bullboard Posts