TSX:SRU.UN - Post by User
Post by
JerryFrancison Aug 06, 2007 10:48pm
324 Views
Post# 13207457
Labtech
LabtechA wager was presented to you by OOA a while back. Explain to us why you have avoided responding to said wager and to date have ignored that esteemed gentleman that officially challenged you. Surely you are ready to stand by your 'convictions' [tehehe] and take up the bashers torch. SEE BELOW TO REFRESH YOUR RECOLATION.
And now labtech, I am going to make you a wager. I was reading through the recently published technical programme for the Copper 2007 Conference in Toronto in August (Dutrizac Symposium) (https://www.metsoc.org/COM2007/technical_program.asp?pg=Technical%20Program)) for anyone interested. I noticed that Starfield is presenting a paper on the metallurgical process on the Monday morning, which presumably will be presented by Harris or Demopoulos (from McGill). My wager is that I am right, that Starfield will carry out flotation and dense medium and other tests on the second-stage solids to look at recovering the PGEs. Anybody in the audience will be able to ask this question. I wager that the answer will be that they are. Are you prepared to bet against it? Are you prepared to wager that you are right and they won’t look at PGE recovery, because they are so enamoured of your arguments that it is not worth while? Are you prepared to, say, bet that you have to tell the board your true intentions here if you lose? Are you prepared to bet that, that all your intense negativity is justified, that you know that your interpretation of the data is correct and mine is wrong?
Sincerely reposted and presented to the labster,
Jerry Francis