RE: AFA is just having a hickup.There is only so much DD, no matter how persistant, that a retail investor (like myself) is able to conduct. After all, there are limits to what one can interpret in reading between the lines of an NR, & limits to what can be gathered from phoning the company for they have to be careful in not releasing insider info.
I wrote our pres over a week ago asking for him to comment of the post that Bombom on 13 Aug attributed to Monterrey on BS Sweeden: https://www.stockhouse.ca/bullboards/viewmessage.asp?no=15393174&t=0&all=0&TableID=1
Basically I was asking for an explanation in an NR so that the items written in Monterrey's email can be collaborated and be known by all investors.
No such reply, either personally to me or as an issued NR, has surfaced. I, an investor of AFA DO NOT LIKE or APPRECIATE this neglect.
That stated, let me now get to the reason I am posting. The marine company that is retrofitting our Sampler ship, is sinking a pile of money & time into that project. I would strongly suggest that they are NOT doing this out of the goodness of their heart. I would put forth that their decision was based on AFA sharing documents/analysis maybe even conjecture detailling the prospects of Block J. Why else would an arm length company invest the millions into a ship to be used for exploring Block J?
Although I am obviously not privy to those documents etc, I am putting a lot of value on their potential.
So a waiting game here but nothing I have read has changed my mind. The potential of AFA is substantial, IMHO, in finding meaningful million of carats amounts of marine diamonds. A few more months to go to unravel this story.
Sorry for being a tad long winded. GLTA