Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF T.SST.U


Primary Symbol: SPTS

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U. The fund invests at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index and in securities that the Adviser determines have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities that comprise the index. The index is designed to measure the performance of short term (1-3 years) public obligations of the U.S. Treasury.


ARCA:SPTS - Post by User

Comment by dfergu7477on Sep 20, 2007 12:17pm
188 Views
Post# 13434876

RE: SST--7.5mm ounces producer in 2008?

RE: SST--7.5mm ounces producer in 2008?Thanks for your reply, jims101. I have a couple thoughts on your response... First, I'm not really concerned over how much SST is going up versus SLW in the course of a single day, week, or month. I was thinking longer term than that--over years. (I'm not a market timer.) Second, SST has stated that they'd like to purchase additional streams at the rate of once a quarter. So, I assumed one more this year (beyond the Lundin deal), and thought I was being conservative in saying they'd have reach agreements on just three more, next year. If 3 million ounces for the next deal isn't the right number, then pick 2 million. Then, if we assume that each succeeding deal is also 2mm ozs., we'll have around 6.5mm ounces of production next year if they do three more deals in 2008. I think it'll be more than that. As to what price SST'll have to pay... I guess we'll find out. I believe both the Capstone and Lundin deals were done earlier this year with silver around $13, so I don't see why they can't continue to use the $4 figure. More deals are not only necessary, they are desirable! And I think that in the long run, silver will dramatically outperform the stock market in general, all base metals, and, yes, even gold itself. But that is a separate and undoubtedly lengthy discussion! {:- ) In that respect, I am also taking a long-term view, and believe SST will ride that wave. Thx!
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>