Hole #6...didn't get a response to this question at NOT board, maybe I will here.
No doubt NOT has compelted hole #6. One must assume that if this hole was visually good, if massive sulphides were encountered, NOT would have released info confirming that...but of course we've seen no release, unlike earlier with visual observations of mineralization in holes 1, 2 and 5. Has the exchange told NOT not to give visual observations any more, or is it that hole 6 was a dud? Perhaps that may explain today's share price drop.
Any comments are welcome. I'm concerned we've had no news on hole 6.