Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF

RE: it’s a good company (bsheppard)

[imallin]

Good post bSheppard. Thanks, sure does make you wonder. Like you, Im here for results. And I personnaly believe that we will never get a straight answer from any naysayer. Thats not their angle or motivation. So asking them a zillion times will get nothing but the same answers. Which personally i don't mind. i mean if they think its worth 5 cents. Than thats their opinion. But i ask you this. Why would you spend this much time on something you don't like, and don't this is worth it. I mean do you head to the supermarket and stare at products you have no intention on buying. Especially for 6 months+. Theres a reason they are here, And like i said before, Unless i sell i really haven't lost anything. But trust these words. Once we spike up to $1 or $2 or $5 or $10. These same guys will be back telling you how they suckered you into selling them their shares. ----------------------------------- POSTED BY BSHEPPARD No one should buy a stock based on a bullboard chat room, I agree, but would you give more credence to the science behind this project... - indicators minerals - presence of green garnets - micro and macro diamonds in core - Debeers offer of free processing after looking at core - presence of brown diamonds which are very closely related to white - bulk sample on the way to be processed - drills turning looking for next kim The facts are, we have diamonds and the process to determine viability is under way. You keep asking for facts. These are all facts which helped make my decision to buy and hold SNO fairly easy. The fact that some basher/disgruntled ex-partner/bored schoolboy/burned investor etc...(take your pick) says $0.05 soon or some pumper/over zealous investor/star dreamer/sincere observer(again take your pick)says "to the moon" means nothing other than entertainment value. You like to present the appearance of wanting the facts but seem to have taken a stance in favor of the garbage spewers who spout retoric with no fact,rhyme or reason to back their opinions. Maybe you could post some facts which show why these indicators are not encouraging. I am not intrested in articles about disputed timeframes of backers money and assays results from over a year ago. These 2 companies agreed to disagreed and parted ways, it seemed like a case of who could outfox who. I did the dd and am comfortable with the History, but it is just that,HISTORY